The Growth of  Hangzhou and the Geopolitical Context in East Asia

http://de2d2g2qlnqhe.cloudfront.net/content/ucpjsah/75/2/182/F8.large.jpg?width=800&height=600&carousel=1

Schematic map of Hangzhou during the Ming dynasty

Chris Chase-Dunn, Hiroko Inoue and E.N. Anderson

Institute for Research on World-Systems

University of California-Riverside

This is IROWS Working Paper #111 available at http://irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows111/irows111.htm

v. 8/16/16 1766 words

      Hangzhou is a large Chinese city at the southern terminal of the Grand Canal and connected by river with the East China Sea near the mouth of the Yangtze River. Hangzhou was called Linan when it was the capital of the Southern Sung dynasty. We are comparing changes in the sizes of largest polities with changes in the sizes of largest cities in the East Asian interstate system. We utilize three compendia of city size estimates – those by Ian Morris (2013), Tertius Chandler (1987) and George Modelski (2003). At first we had used George Modelski’s (2003:63) estimate of 1.5 million for the population size of Hangzhou in 1300 CE. We then discovered an inconsistency in Modelski’s compilation. His Table 12 on page 63 shows 1.5 million for 1300 CE, but his note about Hangzhou on p 65 says it was 1.5 million in 1250 CE.

Like Baghdad, Kaifeng was besieged by the Mongols and captured by them in 1232-3, reportedly with great loss of life. In the meantime the Song dynasty had moved south and, after a brief sojourn in Nanjing, selected Hangzhou as their capital. This then served as the second base for economic growth that produced a powerful expansion of maritime trade. Even after the Southern Song were finally conquered by the Mongols (1279), Hangzhou continued to impress contemporary travelers including Ibn Battuta and Marco Polo. The Venetian in particular left behind a superlative account of that city that prompted many a trader and traveler from Europe to reach out to Chinese markets. Once again, population estimates are uncertain, and range as high as 2.5 m (Elvin 176) but a household enumeration of the Linan capital commandery (fu) (reported in Bielenstein 1987:50-1) suggests a figure of 1.5 million for about 1250. That is impressive but it did not last long for as its port silted up and as the city lost its capital status, it also abandoned its world position.”[1]  Check bielenstein

Modelski’s estimate of 1.5 million for 1300 CE in Table 12 must be a typographical error because Linan was no longer the capital by then. It had been conquered by the Mongols in 1279 and the river had silted up. The estimated sizes of Hangzhou in the 13th and 14th centuries vary from Chandler’s low ones (see Table 1) to very high ones based on Mark Elvin’s(1973) belief in the reports of Marco Polo (1992).

 

 

 

Size (thousands)

622 CE

21

Hangchow

60

800

23

Hangchow

70

900

20

Hangchow

75

1000

19

Hangchow

80

1100

18

Hangchow

90

1150

9

Hangchow

145

1200

1

Hangchow

255

1250

1

Hangchow

320

1300

1

Hangchow

432

1350

1

Hangchow

432

1400

5

Hangchow

235

1450

4

Hangchow

250

Table 1: Population size estimates for Hangzhou made by Tertius Chandler (1987)

 

 

Size (thousands)

1200 CE

Hangzhou

1000

1300

Hangzhou

1500

Table 2: George Modelski (2003: 63 Table 12) (but see discussion above)

year

Size (thousands)

 

1200 CE

1000

Hangzhou

1300

800

Hangzhou

Table 3: Ian Morris (2010: 118) estimates of the populations of Hangzhou

The Wikipedia article on Hangzhou says:

During the Southern Song dynasty, commercial expansion, an influx of refugees from the conquered north, and the growth of the official and military establishments, led to a corresponding population increase and the city developed well outside its 9th-century ramparts. According to the Encyclopćdia Britannica

, Hangzhou had a population of over 2 million at that time, while historian Jacques Gernet has estimated that the population of Hangzhou numbered well over one million by 1276. (Official Chinese census figures from the year 1270 listed some 186,330 families in residence and probably failed to count non-residents and soldiers.) It is believed that Hangzhou was the largest city in the world from 1180 to 1315 and from 1348 to 1358.

And:

Hangzhou was chosen as the new capital of the Southern Song dynasty in 1132, when most of northern China had been conquered by the Jurchens in the Jin–Song wars. The Song court had retreated south to the city in 1129 from its original capital in Kaifeng, after it was captured by the Jurchens in the Jingkang Incident of 1127. From Kaifeng they moved to Nanjing, modern Shangqiu, then to Yangzhou in 1128. The government of the Song intended it to be a temporary capital. However, over the decades Hangzhou grew into a major commercial and cultural center of the Song dynasty. It rose from a middling city of no special importance to one of the world's largest and most prosperous. Once the prospect of retaking northern China had diminished, government buildings in Hangzhou were extended and renovated to better befit its status as an imperial capital and not just a temporary one. The imperial palace in Hangzhou, modest in size, was expanded in 1133 with new roofed alleyways, and in 1148 with an extension of the palace walls. From the early 12th century until the Mongol invasion of 1276, Hangzhou remained the capital and was known as Lin'an. It served as the seat of the imperial government, a center of trade and entertainment, and the nexus of the main branches of the civil service. During that time the city was a gravitational center of Chinese civilization: what used to be considered "central China" in the north was taken by the Jin, an ethnic minority dynasty ruled by Jurchens.

We end up using Ian Morris’s estimates. Morris’s note about Hangzhou says:

1300 CE: Hangzhou, 800,000 (Bairoch 1988: 355); 7.5 points. Bairoch

suggests that four other Chinese cities around 1300 had populations in the

200,000-500,000 range while Hangzhou was “perhaps considerably larger.”

His calculations from the figures for rice consumption, however, point more

precisely to 800,000, while Elvin (1973: 177) calculates 600,000-700,000

from the rice figures. Rozman (1973: 35) also thought 12th-13th century

Hangzhou’s population was over 500,000, and could have been as high as 1million. Kuhn (2009: 205) and Christian (2004: 368) also lean toward 1

million, and Skinner (1977: 30), 1.2 million. I take the higher figure of

roughly 1 million for 1200 CE, and the lower figure of 800,000 for 1300 CE,

by which time population was falling across China as a whole. The city was

certainly the biggest in the world when Marco Polo visited in the late 13

century (Kuhn 2009: 205-209), but the figure implied by Marco’s

comments—5-7 million—must be far too high. There was probably no way

Marco could have known Hangzhou’s population, beyond the simple fact

that it was enormous compared to European or Muslim cities of his day.[2]

 

The large size that Hangzhou reached in the 13th century is relevant to our study of the ways in which changes in geopolitical structures impact the sizes of cities. The usual path is that an empire arises by conquest and then expands an old city or builds a new capital. But the growth of Hangzhou is less directly a function of empire-building. The invasion of Northern China by forest (Jurchin) and steppe nomad (Mongols) marcher states pushed the urban functions that had been located in the Song capital of Kaifeng toward the south, along with a substantial migration of former residents of Kaifeng.  And this corresponded with the long-term rise of the Yangtze River valley as an important center of rice cultivation. The Song Dynasty ruled at first from Kaifeng, well south of Beijing, and the lower Yangtze was already building up.  So when the Song lost Kaifeng and had to move farther  south, they naturally went to the southern end of the Grand Canal, making Hangzhou the main and most strategically located city in East Asia and one of the largest cities in the world in the 13th and 14th centuries CE [3]

Hangzhou Bibliography

Bairoch, Paul 1988. Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present. Chicago:

            University of Chicago Press. P. 355

Bielenstein, Hans 1987 “Chinese historical demography A.D. 2 to 1982” Pp 1-282 in Bulletin of the

            Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, Vol. 59. Stockholm.

Britannica Concise Encyclopedia https://www.britannica.com/place/Hangzhou

Chandler, Tertius 1987 Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth: An Historical Census.  Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellon Press

Cheung, Desmond H. H.2011” A socio-cultural history of sites in Ming Hangzhou” A THESIS
        SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
            DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE

STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0072182

Elvin, Mark. 1973 The Pattern of the Chinese Past. Stanford: Stanford University Press. P.  176

Gernet, Jacques 1962.  Daily Life in China on the Eve of the Mongol Invasion, 1250-1276.  Tr. H. M.

 Wright.  Stanford: Stanford University Press

Latham, Ronald 1958 “Introduction” to Marco Polo The Travels. New York: Penguin.

Modelski, George 2003 World Cities: –3000 to 2000. Washington, DC:  Faros 2000

Morris, Ian. 2013 The Measure of Civilization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

 http://ianmorris.org/docs/social-development.pdf

Mungello, D.E. 1994 The Forgotten Christians of Hangzhou. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Needham, Joseph Shorter science and civilization in china_ pp. 241-2 refers to the Hang-chou Fu Chih

 [Hang-zhou Fu Zhi]  a Gazetteer and historical topography of Hangzhou 1687 and reports that a

navigation light on the river dates from the early Song Dynasty. 

Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History “Hangzhou”

Polo,  Marco 1992 The Travels of Marco Polo, 2 vols. New York: Dover, Vol 2: pp 201.

Wikipedia “Hangzhou” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangzhou#cite_ref-29

Xie, Jing 2016 “Disembodied Historicity: Southern Song Imperial Street in Hangzhou”
        Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 75 No. 2, June 2016; (pp. 182-

            200)   http://jsah.ucpress.edu/content/75/2/182

 



[1] Modelski (2003: 194) has additional notes on Hangzhou in which he cites the observations of Marco Polo and also reports that the river silted up in the late 13th century, which resulted in port traffic moving to Ningpo and later to Shanghai.

[2] We agree with Morris’s take on Polo’s depiction of Hangzhou, which he (Polo) called Kinsai. Polo says he used a letter from the Queen of Kinsai that was intended to keep the conquering Khan from sacking the city as an important source of his information about the city. He was also in prison in Italy with the co-author of his Travels, a romanticist, when he wrote them (Latham 1958). His descriptions were intended to fire up European desires for trade with East Asia, and they did.

[3] The Song investment in building out Hangzhou as an imperial capital is described by Xie (2016).