Urban Upsweeps and Collapses Inventory Appendix

Description: Description: img7

irows.ucr.edu/cd/appendices/setsweeps/setsweepsapp.htm
Appendix to “Settlement Scale Shifts Since the Bronze Age: Upsweeps and Collapses and Semiperipheral Development”

Hiroko Inoue, Alexis Álvarez, Eugene N. Anderson,

Jared Ahmed and Christopher Chase-Dunn

Institute for Research on World-Systems, University of California-Riverside

Riverside, CA  92521-0419 USA

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant #:  NSF-HSD SES-0527720.

v. 4-29-13

Appendix Table of Contents

Excel data files of largest city sizes: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Central System, South Asia, East Asia

Excel data file with urban upsweeps and downsweeps counts

Excel data file containing Ian Fletcher’s estimates of city and empire sizes

Table A1: List of Sweeps and comparison of two methods of calculation

Table A2: Cycles and Sweep Rates Over Time

Figure A1: Largest cities in the Central and East Asian PMNs

Empire-City Comparisons

Figures from the paper

 

Table A1: List of Sweeps and comparison of two counting methods

Two-Method Comparison — CITIES

Mesopotamia

-3700 ~-1450 (2250 yrs)

Upsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

-3600

15

Tell Brak

1 (275%)

1 (275%)

-3300

40

Uruk

1 (700%)

1 (321%)

-2800

80

Uruk

1 (100%)

1 (307%)

-2700

100

Ur

1 (100%)

1 (76%)

Sweeps total

4

4

Ups total

7

7

 

Downsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w smallest

Comp w average

---

---

---

 ---

---

Sweeps total

---

---

0

0

downs total

---

---

7

7

 

Egypt

-2500~-1500 (1000 yrs)
Upsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

-2250

35

Memphis

1 (3400%)

---

-2000

60

Memphis

1 (71%)

1 (71%)

-1600

75

Avaris

----

1 (58%)

Sweeps total

---

---

1

2

Ups total

---

---

3

3

 

Downsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w smallest

Comp w average

-1700

20

Avaris

1 (33%)

1 (-33%)

Sweeps total

0

0

Downs total

2

2

 

Central PMN

1500 ~2000 (3500 yrs)
Upsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

-1200

160

Pi-Ramsis

1 (113%)

--- (---)

-600

200

Babylon

--- (25%)

1 (43%)

-300

500

Carthage

1 (150%)

1 (213%)

1

1000

Rome

1 (100%)

1 (266%)

1000

1200

Baghdad

--- (20%)

1 (57%)

1970

17252

New York

1 (2365%)

1 (2808%)

Sweeps total

---

---

3

5

Ups total

---

---

12

12

 

Downsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

600

150

Constantinople

--- (0%)

1 (-64%)

700

125

Constantinople

--- (-17%)

1 (-70%)

1150

200

Merv / Constantinople

---  (60%)

 1 (-44%)

Sweeps total

---

---

0

3

Downs total

---

---

12

12

 

East Asia

-1750 ~1830 (3580 yrs)
Upsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

-1600

100

Zhengzhou

1 (614%)

1 (614%)

-1250

120

Anyang/Yinxu

--- (20%)

1 (111%)

1

500

Chang'an

1 (317%)

1 (500%)

700

1000

Chang'an

1 (100%)

1 (367%)

1000

1000

Kaifeng

--- (0%)

1 (90%)

Sweeps total

---

---

3

5

Ups total

---

---

9

9

 

Downsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

---

---

---

---

---

Sweeps total

---

---

0

0

Downs total

---

---

8

8

 

South Asia

-500 ~1000 (1500 yrs)

Upsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

-300

400

Pataliputra/Vaishali

1 (900%)

1 (900%)

1500

500

Vijayanagar

---

---

1700

1000

Ayutthaya

---

---

Sweeps total

---

---

1

1

Ups total

---

---

5

5

 

Downsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Comp w largest

Comp w average

---

---

---

---

---

Sweeps total

---

---

0

0

Downs total

---

---

4

4


 

Table: A2: Cycles and Sweep Rates Over Time

Changing Rates of Urban Swings and Sweeps?:

The number of cycles and upsweeps in the five intervals in five regions

Mesopotamia

-3700 ~-1450 (2250 yrs)

   

Interval 450 years

# of cycle

# of upsweeps

# of down sweeps

phase1

- 3700 ~ -3250

2

2

0

phase2

-3249 ~ - 2800

1

1

0

phase3

-2799 ~ - 2350

0.5

0

0

phase4

-2349 ~ - 1850

1

1

0

phase5

-1849 ~ -1400

1.5

0

0

 

Total from our other count table-- FYI

Upsweeps 4; ups 7

Downsweeps 0; downs 6

Egypt

-2500~-1500 (1000 yrs)

 

interval 200 years

# of cycle

# of upsweeps

# of down sweeps

phase1

- 2500 ~ -2300

0.5

0

0

phase2

-2299 ~ - 2100

0.5

0

0

phase3

-2099 ~ - 1900

0.5

1

0

phase4

-1899 ~ - 1700

0.5

0

1

phase5

-1699 ~ -1500

1

1

0

Total from our other count table-- FYI

Upsweeps 2; ups 3

Downsweeps 1; downs 2

Central PMN

-1500~ 2000 (3500 yrs)

 

interval 700 years

# of cycle

# of upsweeps

# of down sweeps

phase1

-1500 ~ -800

2.5

0

0

phase2

-799 ~ -100

2

2

0

phase3

-99 ~ 600

1.5

2

0

phase4

601 ~ 1300

3

1

3

phase5

1301 ~ 2000

3

1

0

Total from our other count table-- FYI

Upsweeps 6; ups 12

Downsweeps 3; downs 12

East Asia

-1750 ~1850 (3600 yrs)

 

interval 720 years

# of cycle

# of upsweeps

# of down sweeps

phase1

-1750 ~ -1030

3

2

1

phase2

-1029 ~ -310

1.5

0

0

phase3

-309 ~ 410

1

1

0

phase4

411 ~ 1130

1

2

0

phase5

1131 ~ 1850

2.5

1

0

Total from our other count table ---FYI

Upsweeps 6; ups 9

Downsweeps 1; downs 8

South Asia

-500 ~1000 (1500 yrs)

 

interval 300 years

# of cycle

# of upsweeps

# of down sweeps

phase1

-500 ~ -200

1

1

0

phase2

-199 ~ 100

0.5

0

0

phase3

101 ~ 400

0.5

0

0

phase4

401 ~ 700

1.5

0

0

phase5

704 ~ 1000

1.5

0

0

Table A2: Frequency of Cycles and Upsweeps in subperiods for each Regional PMN

Table A2 divides the total period for each PMN into five equally-sized subperiods (phases 1-5) and counts the number of cycles, upsweeps and downsweeps for each subperiod to see if there is an acceleration of cycles or sweeps over the period of study.  This exercise shows no consistent trends regarding the frequency of sweeps or cycles.

 

 

Figure A2: Largest cities in the Central and East Asian PMNs

 

Comparison between city and empire (polity) upsweeps

v. 7/12/2012

The following tables compare if there is a relationship between city upsweep and empire (polity) upsweep. 

This is examining whether the upsweep of city size is due to the rise of a very large empire.

Mesopotamia

 Empires upsweep

Year

size

Polity name

-3500

0.0014

Susa (Shush)

-2400

0.05

Lagash

-2250

0.8

Akkadia

-1450

0.3

Mitanni

 

Cities upsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Relationship with Empire upsweep of the same period

-3600

15

Tell Brak

unknown

city upsweep might precede empire upsweep (polity size unknown)

-3300

40

Uruk

unknown

city upsweep might precede empire upsweep (polity size unknown)

-2800

80

Uruk

unknown

although capital of Sumer, annexed to Akkadian empire rise. 

city upsweep might precede empire upsweep

-2700

100

Ur

unknown

urban upsweep might be related to Akkadian empire rise

 

 

Egypt    

Empire upsweeps

Year

Size

Polity name

-2400

0.4

5th Dynasty

-1850

0.5

12th Dynasty

-1650

0.65

Hyksos

 

City upsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Relationship with Empire upsweep of the same period

-2250

35

Memphis

Yes

corresponding urban and polity (Egypt) upsweep

-2000

60

Memphis

Yes

corresponding urban and polity (Egypt) upsweep

-1600

75

Avaris

Yes

rise as the capital of Hyksos

 

 

Central PMN

Empire upsweep

Year

Size

Polity name

-1450

1

18th Dynasty

-670

1.4

Assyria

-480

5.4

Achaemenid Persia

117

5

Rome

750

11.1

Abbasids

1294

29.4

Mongol/Yuan

1936

34.5

Britain

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City upsweeps

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Relationship with Empire upsweep of the same period

-600

200

Babylon

No

rise with the Neo-Babylonian Empire (612- 539 BCE)

-300

500

Carthage

No

pop. growth with trade entrepreneurship

1

1000

Rome

Yes

urban upsweep preceded empire (Rome) upsweep

1000

1200

Baghdad

Yes

rise as the capital of the Abbasid Caliphate

1970

17252

New York

No

rise was due to the formation of a continental hegemon

 

 

East Asia

Empire upsweeps

 

Year

Size

Polity name

-1800

0.45

Xia (Hsia)

-1050

1.25

Western Zhou (Chou)

-176

4.03

Xiongnu (Hsiung-nu)

-50

6

Western Han

100

6.5

Eastern (Later) Han

624

1.5

E. Turks

660

4.9

Tang (T'ang)

1294

29.4

Mongol/Yuan

1790

14.7

Qing

 

City upsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Relationship with Empire upsweep of the same period

-1600

100

Zhengzhou

unknown/yes

corresponding to the rise of Shang dynasty

-1250

120

Anyang/Yinxu

unknown/yes

corresponding to the rise of Shang dynasty

1

500

Chang'an

yes

contributed to the rise of Han dynasty

capital of Western Han (206 BCE ~ 9 CE)

700

1000

Chang'an

yes

contributed to the rise of Tang dynasty

capital of Tang (618-904CE)

1000

1000

Kaifeng

No

rose to form the capital of Song dynasty (960-1279CE)

 

 

South Asia

Empire upsweep

 

Year

Size

Polity name

-260

3.72

Mauryan

 

City upsweeps

 

Year

Pop. Size (k)

City name

Relationship with Empire upsweep of the same period

-300

400

Pataliputra/Vaishali

yes

rose as the capital of Maruyan empire

 

 

Figures from the paper:

Fig. 1.  Types of Medium-term Scale Change in the Largest Settlement in an Interacting Set of Polities

 

Description: Description: fig2

Figure 2:  Largest cities in Mesopotamia, 3700 BCE-1450 BCE (population in thousands)

 

Description: Description: fig3

 

Figure 3:  Egyptian Largest Cities 2500 BCE-1500 BCE

 

Description: Description: fig4

Figure 4:  Central System Largest Cities, 1500 BCE- 2000 CE

 

Description: Description: fig5

Figure 5:  Largest cities in East Asia

Description: Description: fig6

 

Figure 6:  South Asian Largest Cities, 500 BCE-1100 CE